Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Optimization batch 9: avoid detecting irrelevant renames

> This series determines paths which meet special cases where detection of
> renames is irrelevant, where the irrelevance is due to the fact that the
> merge machinery will arrive at the same result regardless of whether a
> rename is detected for any of those paths.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> 
>  * Added an extended comment about filtering order to the first patch, to
>    address Stolee's question
>  * Added a new testcase that will fail if the critical "if (content_relevant
>    || location_relevant)" check only checks for one of those two or the
>    intersection of those two, as suggested by Stolee
>  * Fixed the other minor problems Stolee pointed out in his review (stray
>    newline, wording of comment)