Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Demonstrate a bug in --word-diff where diff.*.wordregex is "sticky"
On 03/14/2012 08:50 PM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Show 14 quoted lines
> The test case applies a custom wordRegex to one file in a diff, and expects
> that the default word splitting applies to the second file in the diff.
> But the custom wordRegex is also incorrectly used for the second file.
>
> Helped-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
> ---
> Changes in this round, where I do not resend 2/3 and 3/3:
>
> - Use test_unconfig.
> - Use compare_diff_patch to check the result.
> - Fix a broken && chain at the end of the last test.
> - Name the files a.tex and z.tex as per your suggestion.
>
But Junio suggested using 'z.txt' (not 'z.tex'); quoting his last message:
The use of files "a" and "z" as an example of pair of a tex and non tex
input makes the test look overly artificial (why not a.tex vs z.txt or
something?), but other than that, looks cleanly done.
Regards,
Stefano
Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com>