Re: [PATCH] test: errors preparing for a test are not special
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- Dec 14, 2011, 08:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4EE863AF.2070606@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <20111214082203.GB13166@elie.hsd1.il.comcast.net>
Am 12/14/2011 9:22, schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
Show 13 quoted lines
> Johannes Sixt wrote: >> Am 12/13/2011 23:35, schrieb Joe Ratterman: > >>> test_expect_success TTY 'no pager with --no-pager' ' >>> rm -f paginated.out || >>> cleanup_fail && >> >> What kind of bogosity do I see in the context of this hunk > [...] >> Wouldn't rm -f always succeed under normal circumstances, and then the >> rest of the test would be skipped? > > No, && and || are left-associative.
<Facepalm/> You are right, of course, and I should have known better. (I need more caffein.)
At any rate, your patch makes the code much more comprehensible.
-- Hannes