git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: what are the chances of a 'pre-upload' hook?

From
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Date
Nov 25, 2011, 13:09 UTC
Message-ID
<4ECF939D.8020706@op5.se>
In-Reply-To
<CAMK1S_gh_CsWc-DnbOuUwn+H1i3skm99xzDbWe-wxsKKS0Qw-w@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/25/2011 05:13 AM, Sitaram Chamarty wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Sitaram Chamarty<sitaramc@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> (...and/or a post-upload hook)
>>
>> Has this ever come up?
> 
> Sorry for the google-fu fail and for replying to my own post.
> http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Removal-of-post-upload-hook-td4394312.html
> is the longest thread I (later) found.
> 
> The quick summary, in the words of Jeff (second post in that link) is:
> "Because [upload]-pack runs as the user who is [fetching], not as the
> repository owner. So by convincing you to [fetch from] my repository
> in a multi-user environment, I convince you to run some arbitrary code
> of mine."
> 
> My contention (today) is:
> 
>    - you're already taking that risk for push
>    - so this would add a new risk only for people who fetch but don't push
>    - which, I submit, is a very small (if not almost empty) set of people
> 

People who fetch but don't push is, by far, the vast majority of git users. Think of everyone fetching from any public software repository without having write access to it. If you think of git.git and linux.git alone I think it's safe to assume the number of "fetch-no-push" outnumber the "push-and-whatnot" group by some quarter million to one.

> I may be wrong but I imagine shared environments are those where
> almost everyone will push at least once in a while.  It's a closed
> group of people, probably all developers, etc etc etc...
> 

Not really. We fetch from each other quite a lot at work, and from each others semi-public repositories on a shared server where we've all got accounts (ie, write access), but we very, very rarely push into each others repositories. The sharepoint is the "official" repo on the repo-server, which the buildbots gets its code from and where everything to be released, maintained or handled in some way in the future resides.

Anyways. Shooting down the arguments *against* pre-upload hooks are quite silly if it's not combined with some fresh arguments *for* such a hook.

So... What usecase do you envision where you'd need one?
-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.
Previous: Sitaram ChamartyNext: Sitaram Chamarty
Message 5 of 23 in “what are the chances of a 'pre-upload' hook?”
  1. Sitaram ChamartyNov 25, 2011
  2. Martin FickNov 25, 2011
  3. Martin FickNov 25, 2011
  4. Sitaram ChamartyNov 25, 2011
  5. Andreas EricssonNov 25, 2011
  6. Sitaram ChamartyNov 25, 2011
  7. Jeff KingNov 25, 2011
  8. Junio C HamanoNov 26, 2011
  9. Jeff KingNov 26, 2011
  10. Junio C HamanoNov 26, 2011
  11. Jeff KingNov 26, 2011
  12. Junio C HamanoNov 27, 2011
  13. Jeff KingNov 26, 2011
  14. Jeff KingNov 27, 2011
  15. Junio C HamanoNov 27, 2011
  16. Sitaram ChamartyNov 27, 2011
  17. Junio C HamanoNov 28, 2011
  18. Jeff KingNov 28, 2011
  19. Sitaram ChamartyNov 28, 2011
  20. Sitaram ChamartyNov 28, 2011
  21. Jeff KingNov 28, 2011
  22. Jeff KingNov 28, 2011
  23. Jeff KingNov 28, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.