Re: [PATCH 1/2] git svn dcommit: new option --interactive.
- From
- Frédéric Heitzmann <frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 7, 2011, 20:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4E67CDDC.1020305@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110906202601.GA11668@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Le 06/09/2011 22:26, Eric Wong a écrit :
Show 34 quoted lines
> Frédéric Heitzmann<frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Allow the user to check the patch set before it is commited to SNV. It is then
>> possible to accept/discard one patch, accept all, or quit.
>>
>> This interactive mode is similar with 'git send email' behaviour. However,
>> 'git svn dcommit' returns as soon as one patch is discarded.
>>
>> Part of the code was taken from git-send-email.perl
>> Thanks-to: Eric Wong<normalperson@yhbt.net> for the initial idea.
>> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Heitzmann<frederic.heitzmann@gmail.com>
> I agree with this feature, a few comments inline.
>
>> I would have preferred not duplicating the code snippets taken from
>> git-send-email ('ask' function, Term related code, ...) but I preferred not
>> to spoil Git.pm with it.
>> Any comment on a better way to factor perl code would be appreciated.
> We should put this into Git.pm at some point.
> (Somebody should refactor git-svn.perl into separate files too... :x)
>
>> Documentation/git-svn.txt | 8 +++++
>> git-svn.perl | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> Tests and feature should be the same patch
>> + return defined $default ? $default : undef
>> + unless defined $term->IN and defined fileno($term->IN) and
>> + defined $term->OUT and defined fileno($term->OUT);
> Things to make life easier for (mainly) C programmers:
>
> * Use C-style "&&" and "||" for conditionals. "and" and "or" are lower
> precedence and better used for control flow (see perlop(1) manpage).
>
> * Also, use parentheses for defined(foo) to disambiguate multiple
> conditions/statements.
>My fault : I copied-pasted the 'ask' function from git-send-email. Even if I rewrite it a litlle, it should not prevent anyone to mutalize some code into Git.pm. And, indeed, it will improve readability.
I wait a few days to see if anyone else has some comments and I send a V2 patch serie.
Thanks for reviewing.
-- Fred