Re: [RFC/PATCH] t0081-*.sh: Fix failure of the 'long read' tests
- From
Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- Date
- Apr 30, 2011, 17:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4DBC45F9.7090804@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110426234850.GC32491@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
Show 15 quoted lines
> Yeah, that syntax is handled just fine by my bash and dash: > > $ cat >foo.sh <<'EOF' > i=1 > : $((i = $i + 1)) > echo $i > EOF > > $ bash foo.sh > 2 > $ bash --version | head -n 1 > GNU bash, version 4.1.5(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) > > $ dash foo.sh > 2
Er, ... yeah, it works for my bash and (up-to-date) dash too! [not the installed dash, of course, for which it is a syntax error]
Ahem ... *blush*
> But I think your i=$(($i + 1)) is the right solution.
Yes, this fixes the problem and does not introduce a regression.
So, the patch is correct, but (apart from the last sentence) the commit message is *absolute rubbish*. I won't bore you with the details of my lunacy! :-P
However, I much prefer Jonathan's patch which removes this test completely!
ATB, Ramsay Jones