Show 23 quoted lines
> On 03/01/2011 07:12 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Michael J Gruber
>> <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
>>> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy venit, vidit, dixit 01.03.2011 12:13:
>>>> If you are going to turn pathspecs into something more complex,
>>>> reserve room for future extension. I have negative pathspecs that can
>>>> utilize it.
>>>>
>>>> I take it, from now on people must refer file name ':foo' as './:foo'
>>>> with your patch?
>>> That is up for discussion, of course. When discussing a new approach for
>>> file mode dependent attributes, I was hoping to get through with
>>> symlink:path, and did not. But it was decided that something like
>>> :symlink:path would be good enough, in the sense of avoiding enough
>>> possible conflicts. That made me hope that :path would be, too.
>> Good morning! I'm saner now. How about :/path? That would reserve
>> anything next to ':' except '/'.
>
> I like this. The only 'failure' that comes to mind is something like
>
> git log -- */*.c
>
> when there's a subdirectory named ':'.