Re: git-grep to operate across who repository and not just CWD?
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Mar 1, 2011, 08:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4D6CB45F.1030800@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTim78nQgS7NPXWErQyrqmt41OUXY6gzJmMwjtxo9@mail.gmail.com>
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy venit, vidit, dixit 01.03.2011 09:16:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Michael J Gruber > <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote: >> I would love "git grep" to be repowise, with the simple "git grep ." to >> make it relative to cwd. We've discussed making more commands repowise, >> and the consensus (which I've stated above, accepting the majority vote) >> was that some should stay, e.g. git-grep. The discussion started with >> >> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/166135> >> >> and the consensus is stated here: >> >> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/167149> >> >> This does not prevent you from submitting a "--full-tree" patch for >> git-grep, of course. > > In fact Junio wrote one: > > http://mid.gmane.org/7vk4xggv27.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org
Oh yes, thanks for reminding me. And guess who replied first back then? Oh well...
> If I remember correctly, it was dropped because of the interaction > with pathspecs (relative to cwd vs to worktree's root). I'd be great > if someone can pick it up and finish it.
Rereading that thread, I don't think there was any objection against "--full-tree", but it suffered from DTD (discussed-to-death). To make it really usefull, one would need a short-cut/option/whatever, and that's where the discussion went astray. I have an idea, though :)
Michael