Re: Challenges for an octopus merge
- From
- Markus Elfring <markus.elfring@web.de>
- Date
- Feb 11, 2011, 16:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4D55627F.30305@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v8vxn6fdv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
> The second-to-last line of the output needs to be rephrased.
Which wording adjustment have you got in mind?
> Octopus is not for recording conflicting merges and when it punts you > shouldn't be attempting to resolve and record it as an octopus merge.
Would it make sense to specify that the merging process may switch to the strategy "resolve" on demand?
Regards, Markus