From: Markus Elfring Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:23:27 GMT Subject: Re: Challenges for an octopus merge Message-ID: <4D55627F.30305@web.de> In-Reply-To: <7v8vxn6fdv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> > The second-to-last line of the output needs to be rephrased. Which wording adjustment have you got in mind? > Octopus is not for recording conflicting merges and when it punts you > shouldn't be attempting to resolve and record it as an octopus merge. Would it make sense to specify that the merging process may switch to the strategy "resolve" on demand? Regards, Markus