git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4?

From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date
Feb 7, 2011, 08:27 UTC
Message-ID
<4D4FACE2.4060206@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To
<vpqbp2ojq5x.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
Matthieu Moy venit, vidit, dixit 07.02.2011 07:48:
Show 24 quoted lines
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
>> On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 09:50:37PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>>> As it takes pathspecs (think "git add -u this-file"), it fundamentally
>>> shouldn't be tree-wide.  I think the original implementation didn't take
>>> pathspecs and was mistakenly done as tree-wide operation, but I think it
>>> was fixed rather quickly.
>>
>> Is "git add -p" broken, then? It takes pathspecs relative to the current
>> directory, but "git add -p" without arguments operates from the root,
>> not from the current subdirectory.
> 
> It's not just "git add -p". Take "git log", "git status", "git
> commit", "git diff" ... well, most Git commands taking pathspecs
> optionally:
> 
> git foo   => tree-wide
> git foo . => the . acts as a path limiter
> 
> and this is the right thing to do. Making "git foo" equivalent to "git
> foo ." makes it hard to recover the tree-wide behavior from a
> subdirectory (git foo ../../../).
> 

First of all, I'd vote for having this work the same way across all commands - as Junio explained, the destinction we currently have is not easy to grasp, and is violated by add -p.

Second, we have an established, natural syntax for "base on cwd", namely ".", but we do not have any for "base on worktree root". (I think we discussed and discarded "/" at some point.)

So, if we go for "relative to cwd by default" we would need a simple way to specify the root - and by simple I mean taking at most 2 chars in the pathspec, not a long option!

In summary, I think going for "relative to worktree root by default" is more in line with git's overall philosophy (so it teaches the right concept), something the user is exposed to already in most places (but not all), and limiting to "." already works in most (all?) places, even with "status" and "status -s". We would only need to change the few places where we still default to cwd, and make sure they accept "." when we change their default to repo root.

Cheers, Michael

Previous: Matthieu MoyNext: SZEDER Gábor
Message 33 of 34 in “"git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4?”
  1. Sebastian PippingFeb 6, 2011
  2. Jeff KingFeb 6, 2011
  3. Sebastian PippingFeb 6, 2011
  4. Matthieu MoyFeb 6, 2011
  5. SZEDER GáborFeb 6, 2011
  6. Sebastian PippingFeb 6, 2011
  7. Junio C HamanoFeb 7, 2011
  8. Jeff KingFeb 7, 2011
  9. Junio C HamanoFeb 7, 2011
  10. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyFeb 7, 2011
  11. SZEDER GáborFeb 7, 2011
  12. Junio C HamanoFeb 7, 2011
  13. Jeff KingFeb 7, 2011
  14. SZEDER GáborFeb 8, 2011
  15. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2011
  16. Junio C HamanoFeb 9, 2011
  17. Jeff KingFeb 9, 2011
  18. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyFeb 10, 2011
  19. Jeff KingFeb 10, 2011
  20. Junio C HamanoFeb 10, 2011
  21. Johannes SixtFeb 10, 2011
  22. Joshua JuranFeb 10, 2011
  23. Matthieu MoyFeb 10, 2011
  24. command-list.txt: mark git-archive plumbingNguyen Thai Ngoc Duy, Feb 15, 2011
  25. Junio C HamanoFeb 15, 2011
  26. Nguyen Thai Ngoc DuyFeb 16, 2011
  27. Matthieu MoyFeb 7, 2011
  28. Jeff KingFeb 7, 2011
  29. Junio C HamanoFeb 7, 2011
  30. Eric RaibleFeb 8, 2011
  31. Junio C HamanoFeb 8, 2011
  32. Matthieu MoyFeb 7, 2011
  33. Michael J GruberFeb 7, 2011
  34. SZEDER GáborFeb 7, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.