Re: "git add -u" broken in git 1.7.4?
- From
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
- Date
- Feb 10, 2011, 02:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110210023132.GB5073@sigill.intra.peff.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTi=dmqRQqBD2HZfv2x-kxaqrxvSx3r62d09KMP1k@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:24:55AM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
Show 8 quoted lines
> > I don't think it's worth moving ls-files/ls-tree. They're plumbing that > > people don't use frequently. So the cost of moving them is high (because > > we are breaking something meant to be scriptable) and the benefit is low > > (because users don't type them a lot). > > No we should not, but we should add --full-tree to > ls-files/ls-tree/archive. I'd love "ls-files --full-tree > '*somefile*'".
ls-tree already has --full-tree (and --full-name, which just gives full pathnames but still restricts output to files in the current directory). ls-files. ls-files has --full-name, but AFAIK needs a matching --full-tree.
-Peff