Re: clone --bare vs push
- From
- Neal Kreitzinger <nkreitzinger@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 4, 2011, 05:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4D22B037.9010408@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20110104045839.GA8225@burratino>
On 1/3/2011 10:58 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Neal Kreitzinger wrote: > >> you can also use the file:// url format to create a complete copy and not >> use hardlinks. see git-clone manpage. >> >> e.g. git clone --bare file:///fullpathto/X y.git > > Thanks, that's useful; cc-ing Levend. > > [Side note: I wrote in the past: > > | In traditional newsgroups it seems to be most common to just reply to > | the author by mail or follow-up to the group, so I wouldn't feel too > | bad. > > but probably that was unclear of me. The convention on _this_ list[1] is > to reply to all participants in a thread, so new participants do not > need to subscribe if they don't want to. Thunderbird (e.g.) seems to > be good at doing that for what it's worth.] > > [1] at least as I perceive it; please feel free to correct me if I > have misunderstood
This is a "reply all" from thunderbird. This looks like it is doing the cc correctly...
v/r, Neal