Re: clone --bare vs push
- From
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 4, 2011, 04:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20110104045839.GA8225@burratino>
- In-Reply-To
- <ifu8d2$t61$1@dough.gmane.org>
Neal Kreitzinger wrote:
> you can also use the file:// url format to create a complete copy and not > use hardlinks. see git-clone manpage. > > e.g. git clone --bare file:///fullpathto/X y.git
Thanks, that's useful; cc-ing Levend.
[Side note: I wrote in the past:
| In traditional newsgroups it seems to be most common to just reply to | the author by mail or follow-up to the group, so I wouldn't feel too | bad.
but probably that was unclear of me. The convention on _this_ list[1] is to reply to all participants in a thread, so new participants do not need to subscribe if they don't want to. Thunderbird (e.g.) seems to be good at doing that for what it's worth.]
[1] at least as I perceive it; please feel free to correct me if I have misunderstood