Re: [PATCH] completion: Add PS1 configuration for submodules

> On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 00:22, Scott Kyle <scott@appden.com> wrote:
>>> For those who often work on repositories with submodules, the dirty
>>> indicator for unstaged changes will almost always show because development
>>> is simultaneously happening on those submodules. The config option
>>> diff.ignoreSubmodules is not appropriate for this use because it has larger
>>> implications.
>>
>> Wouldn't it be a lot better to instead add support for showing
>> submodule dirtyness as distinct from the main tree's dirtyness? Then
>> you could easily spot if you had either your tree / submodule tree
>> changes, without just ignoring them.
> 
> That sounds like a good idea, but it doesn't necessarily have to come with
> this patch. Scott's use case here is he has a submodule that is _always_ dirty,
> and he simply doesn't want to see that stuff in the PS1. Having an option to
> show it separately would be very useful for me, but should perhaps be written
> as a separate patch.