Re: Avery Pennarun's git-subtree?
- From
Jens Lehmann <jens.lehmann@web.de>
- Date
- Jul 23, 2010, 15:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4C49B103.2010002@web.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <AANLkTil2ZHsV-PH46wfeqqvB27akRw3egDWRtJbIPLXb@mail.gmail.com>
Am 22.07.2010 23:33, schrieb Avery Pennarun:
Show 13 quoted lines
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > <avarab@gmail.com> wrote: >> But it's also clear that we have a lot of tribal knowledge about the >> lackings of git submodule / git subtree. It would be *really* useful >> if people like Avery and Jens which have obviously thought hard about >> the submodule/subtree issues would draft up some (calmly written) docs >> about how the two differ (with comparison tables etc.). >> >> That'd be a very helpful resource for Git users in deciding which one >> to use. > > I think I'm too biased to write that, but if someone else wants to > take the lead, I could certainly contribute.
While I don't consider myself biased, I just don't know enough about the details of the subtree approach to write that.
But I would certainly contribute to the submodule side of such a document too.