Re: [RFC PATCH] rerere: fix overeager gc

> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net> writes:
>> Am 6/29/2010 19:59, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>>> One possibility is to look at the timestamp of the directory itself
>>> instead.  Then we can safely gc otherwise-unused "thisimage" file when
>>> rerere is not in use.  I wonder if directory m_time timestamps are usable
>>> for this purpose on non-POSIX platforms?
>>
>> I don't think that will work at all: We only use fopen() to write
>> thisimage, which only truncates the file, but doesn't modify mtime of the
>> directory. Nor do we create any other (temporary) directory entries that
>> would modify the mtime.
> 
> Ah, I see; I don't mind a patch that fixes the creation of thisimage to
> follow the "create into temporary and then commit by renaming" pattern.
> 
> Would that solve this issue?