Re: [PATCH 1/2] MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater compatibility
- From
Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
- Date
- Dec 29, 2009, 21:09 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4B3A7000.4050308@kdbg.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <hhbldr$di8$1@ger.gmane.org>
Sebastian Schuberth schrieb:
> MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater compatibility
Why this? Compatibility with what? What's the problem with the status quo?
-- Hannes