From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:09:20 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater compatibility
Message-ID: <4B3A7000.4050308@kdbg.org>
In-Reply-To: <hhbldr$di8$1@ger.gmane.org>

Sebastian Schuberth schrieb:
> MinGW: Use pid_t more consequently, introduce uid_t for greater compatibility

Why this? Compatibility with what? What's the problem with the status quo?

-- Hannes