Re: [RFC PATCH] Record a single transaction for conflicting push operations
- From
- Gustav Hållberg <gustav@virtutech.com>
- Date
- Dec 21, 2009, 14:31 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4B2F86BB.9090104@virtutech.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <b8197bcb0912210548q67c1da4bhe023bed2811394d4@mail.gmail.com>
On 2009-12-21 14:48, Karl Wiberg wrote:
> I've seen more than one complaint that the current behavior is > confusing even if we don't count the bug, so I thought this was part > of the motivation.
I don't know if this would be better than the other suggested solutions, but if "stg log" would clearly identify multi-stage entries as such, the current confusion would probably mostly go away.
Currently this is done reasonably well for make_temp_patch(), which says "refresh (create temporary patch)" in the log, but I think this could be taken further.
For example, if such annotations said "foo: stage N" or similar, indicating that this was the Nth step in the "foo" command (think "rebase" or whatever), it would be good enough for me least.
- Gustav