Re: [PATCH 3/3] rebase: refuse to rebase with -s ours
- From
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 16, 2009, 23:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4B01DA65.7050003@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.DEB.1.00.0911162213590.4985@pacific.mpi-cbg.de>
Johannes Schindelin wrote: [...]
> As gitzilla once said "I cannot provide alternative patches, so that's > that".
I'm not sure I actually said that [*1*] but I did point out that when there is an active discussion about which of multiple ways a feature can be implemented, the party that produces code usually gets their way.
[*1*] There was beer involved and I was jet-lagged so maybe I did say that when I meant what I wrote above.