Re: [PATCH 0/3] Document and refuse rebase -s ours
- From
Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
- Date
- Nov 15, 2009, 21:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200911152213.18743.trast@student.ethz.ch>
- In-Reply-To
- <7veinzfqj9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > I'd rewrite [3/3] in the following way to keep it easier to maintain the > blacklist, like this. > > case "$1" in > - ours) > + ours | theirs | octopus | subtree)
I agree with the rewrite; it's easier to maintain, even though it's now in a quite strange place.
However, I think the example you gave is misleading: 'subtree' is a useful strategy if you want to rebase across a subtree merge boundary, isn't it?
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch