Re: [PATCH] Add the --submodule-summary option to the diff option family
- From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
- Date
- Oct 5, 2009, 06:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4AC98FC8.3090202@viscovery.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vbpkmn6oi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano schrieb:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> + fwrite(sb.buf, sb.len, 1, f);
>> +
>> + if (!message) {
>> + while ((commit = get_revision(&rev))) {
>> + strbuf_setlen(&sb, 0);
>> + if (del)
>> + strbuf_addstr(&sb, commit->object.flags &
>> + SYMMETRIC_LEFT ? del : add);
>> + format_commit_message(commit, format, &sb,
>> + rev.date_mode);
>> + if (del)
>> + strbuf_addstr(&sb, reset);
>
> - In the "ANSI-terminal only" world view, adding colors to strbuf and
> writing it out together with the actual strings is an easy thing to do.
> Don't Windows folks have trouble converting this kind of code to their
> color control call that is separate from writing strings out? If it is
> not a problem, I do not have any objection to it, but otherwise I'd
> suggest not to add any more code that stores color escape sequence in
> strbuf, so that we would not make later conversion by Windows folks
> harder than necessary.Thanks for noticing this! To store color escapes in strbuf is not a problem as long as the string is finally written using printf, fprintf, or fputs.
>> + strbuf_addch(&sb, '\n'); >> + fwrite(sb.buf, sb.len, 1, f);
Outch! fwrite doesn't interpret color escapes. AFAICS, this sequence is easy to change such that it uses fprintf().
-- Hannes