Re: [PATCH 0/2] teach am and rebase -q/--quiet
- From
Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jun 14, 2009, 07:07 UTC
- Message-ID
- <4A34A1AC.2070808@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vk53fvini.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 13 quoted lines
> There are many valid cases where it makes sense to use stderr for messages > that are not errors (e.g. diagnostics, prompts, progress reports, and > informational messages that otherwise would clutter machine parsable > output meant to go to stdout). > > I do not understand why some people seem to think stderr is only for > errors. I think we even saw a broken interpretive language environment > where the system considers it an error if a program it launched said > anything to stderr, instead of correctly diagnosing the exit status from > it? > > It is a disease. >
If I understand you correctly, wrapping them in quiet checks is fine. Also, thanks for the explanation. I'll consider my self inoculated.