Re: On "git status"
- From
Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- Date
- Apr 24, 2009, 11:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <49F1A51C.40704@drmicha.warpmail.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <49F1BD85.16747.5FBF6DC@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
Ulrich Windl venit, vidit, dixit 24.04.2009 13:24:
Show 5 quoted lines
> Hi, > > I'm unsure it exists already, but "git status" doesn't display the tracked files. > Would it make sense to have those reported with a "git status -v" (for verbose)? > (You know: I'm thinking about "cvs status"...)
"git status" is basically "git commit --dry-run", which is different from "cvs/svn/hg status".
"git diff --name-status" gives output similar to those.
"git ls-files" allows to list all tracked files.
Michael