From: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:40:12 GMT
Subject: Re: On "git status"
Message-ID: <49F1A51C.40704@drmicha.warpmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <49F1BD85.16747.5FBF6DC@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>

Ulrich Windl venit, vidit, dixit 24.04.2009 13:24:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm unsure it exists already, but "git status" doesn't display the tracked files. 
> Would it make sense to have those reported with a "git status -v" (for verbose)?
> (You know: I'm thinking about "cvs status"...)

"git status" is basically "git commit --dry-run", which is different
from "cvs/svn/hg status".

"git diff --name-status" gives output similar to those.

"git ls-files" allows to list all tracked files.

Michael