Re: On git 1.6 (novice's opinion)

From: Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Date: Apr 1, 2009, 07:40 UTC
Message-ID: <49D33686.30872.5EB934@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <3e8340490903282241u355ce5b3u1a6ff23b27f4ec12@mail.gmail.com>

On 29 Mar 2009 at 1:41, Bryan Donlan wrote:

Show 10 quoted lines

> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Ulrich Windl
> <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
> 
> 
> > 3) "git undo": If possible undo the effects of the last command.
> 
> You can roll back the state of most local references by using the git
> reflog (see git reflog --help for more information). This covers most
> situations - but note that it only works to roll back to a committed
> state, and won't save any uncommitted data at all.

Hmm...kind of an idea:

"git undo <command>" print help text on how to undo the effect of <command>. I feel that may be useful. maybe replace "undo" with "undo-instructions".

Regards, Ulrich