Re: On git 1.6 (novice's opinion)
- From
- Ulrich Windl <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
- Date
- Mar 27, 2009, 13:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <49CCE520.17260.2586E134@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <37fcd2780903270524y39456c5fre0a2f8f9c5f4d160@mail.gmail.com>
On 27 Mar 2009 at 15:24, Dmitry Potapov wrote:
Show 12 quoted lines
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Ulrich Windl > <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: > > > > what made me wonder is this (about item 1): I thought I've read that blobs store > > content and attributes, so very obviously I wondered why not store thr "right > > attributes" (i.e. the time of the file). My reasoning: You make some changes, then > > test them (which might last several hours or days). The if I'm happy I'll > > "commit". > > With Git, you usually commit your changes immediately (without waiting > the result > of testing), because you can always undo commit until you publish your changes.
Hi!
AFAIK, "committing" in git is "kind of publishing your work" (others may pull it). I don't like publishing my mistakes ;-) Even if no-one pulls the commit, your "undo" refers to "committing a fix for the last committed mistake", right? Again, I don't really want to document/archive (i.e. commit) my mistake. Or did I miss something here? I know: Other's opinions are quite different on these issues.
Regards, Ulrich