Re: Git and tagging hook
- From
Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
- Date
- Oct 17, 2008, 07:04 UTC
- Message-ID
- <48F83914.8080508@op5.se>
- In-Reply-To
- <20081016201502.GA6362@efreet.light.src>
Jan Hudec wrote:
> As for people replacing their local commits, this is common especially in > Linux (and Git) development model.
It's common everywhere where projects use peer review.
Results 1 - 50 of about 14,600 for '"PATCH v2" vger.kernel.org' Results 1 - 50 of about 360,000 for "PATCH v2"
So yes, it is a very common practice and anything interacting with a remote database based on each commit action will almost certainly be doing something wrong quite a lot of the time, especially since not all the patch-series end up being incorporated into a release anyway.
The only sane integration point is the public watering-hole repository used for the project, and especially the release branch (or the "for-linus" branches around the world for sub-projects).
-- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231