Re: Suggestion: "man git clone"
- From
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
- Date
- Aug 22, 2008, 11:37 UTC
- Message-ID
- <48AEA510.6040004@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <48AD99DF.5090802@zytor.com>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists) wrote: >> >> Sorry man that behaviour is the way "man" works. See "man man". >> >> $ git clone --help >> or >> $ git help clone >> >> work right? >> >> Peter >> >> P.S: man, there are puns in that... > > I know that that is the way "man" currently works. > > I doubt you find *anyone* who relies on the current behaviour, so I am > suggesting changing man. That's why the man author was on the recipient > list, but you removed it.
Actually, the current "man" behavior is very convenient when you want to lookup multiple things. And *I* do use that feature.