From: A Large Angry SCM Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:37:52 GMT Subject: Re: Suggestion: "man git clone" Message-ID: <48AEA510.6040004@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <48AD99DF.5090802@zytor.com> H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists) wrote: >> >> Sorry man that behaviour is the way "man" works. See "man man". >> >> $ git clone --help >> or >> $ git help clone >> >> work right? >> >> Peter >> >> P.S: man, there are puns in that... > > I know that that is the way "man" currently works. > > I doubt you find *anyone* who relies on the current behaviour, so I am > suggesting changing man. That's why the man author was on the recipient > list, but you removed it. Actually, the current "man" behavior is very convenient when you want to lookup multiple things. And *I* do use that feature.