Re: [PATCH] compat: fixes for header handling with OpenBSD / NetBSD
- From
Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
- Date
- Jun 3, 2025, 03:56 UTC
- Message-ID
- <47c58a78-d38b-4170-87fc-c9332618d0da@comstyle.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <87wm9ut3uo.fsf@gmail.com>
On 2025-06-02 2:06 p.m., Collin Funk wrote:
Show 26 quoted lines
> Hi Brad, > > You wrote: > >> Handle OpenBSD and NetBSD as FreeBSD / DragonFly are. OpenBSD would >> need _XOPEN_SOURCE to be set to 700. Its simpler to just not set >> _XOPEN_SOURCE. >> >> CC strbuf.o >> strbuf.c:645:6: warning: call to undeclared function 'getdelim'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] >> r = getdelim(&sb->buf, &sb->alloc, term, fp); >> ^ >> 1 warning generated. >> >> Signed-off-by: Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com> >> --- >> compat/posix.h | 11 +++++------ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > I noticed this as well when testing your other fixes. > > Just one question about this chunk: > >> #define _DEFAULT_SOURCE 1 >> -#define _NETBSD_SOURCE 1 > Why remove this definition? I think it might be useful on some older > systems and seems harmless otherwise.
_XOPEN_SOURCE restricts the build environment. _NETBSD_SOURCE is added to counteract _XOPEN_SOURCE. Not setting it in the first place provides everything by default.
I was removing it as it should no longer be necessary.
But as said, it is harmless. I can leave it in if desired.
Show 7 quoted lines
> Other than that, I tested on OpenBSD 7.6 and NetBSD 10.0 and this patch > fixes the missing declarations. So: > > Reviewed-by: Collin Funk <collin.funk1@gmail.com> > > Collin >