Re: All I wanted was git-fast-export
- From
- Paul Gardiner <osronline@glidos.net>
- Date
- Feb 17, 2008, 17:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <47B86818.7010706@glidos.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802101248260.11591@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 27 quoted lines
> Hi,
>
> [please do not look the other way when you respond to me, i.e. do not cull
> me from the Cc: list. Thankyouverymuch]
>
> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Paul Gardiner wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>>> The thing is, filter-branch was _written for this purpose_. So if you
>>> know what commit you rewrote last, you can make the process
>>> faster/safer by issuing
>>>
>>> $ git filter-branch --msg-filter="<blabla>" <old-commit>..master
>> That does look just what I need, but did you see the reason I thought I
>> couldn't use it? I need to repeatedly sync the git repository from a
>> live cvs repository, and repeatedly filter the new commit messages.
>
> Oh, I thought you saw why I put in that "<old-commit>...". You do not
> really need it, as filter-branch will come up with the _same_ commit
> hashes, unless _something_ was changed.
>
> IOW if you have only commits without that "Summary: " prefix, the
> filter-branch call will be a (not so cheap) no-op.
>
> But of course, I meant to suggest (admittedly, in a very short short-hand)
> that you use "git filter-branch ... origin@{1}..origin" after cvsimport.I'm still struggling a bit to understand ref specs. I'm using --all at the moment, but that's very slow. What I need is to filter the new commits of all branches. Will origin@{1}..origin do that, or does it just affect master?
P.