Re: All I wanted was git-fast-export
- From
- Paul Gardiner <osronline@glidos.net>
- Date
- Feb 13, 2008, 09:10 UTC
- Message-ID
- <47B2B3FA.4060809@glidos.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LSU.1.00.0802101248260.11591@racer.site>
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Show 21 quoted lines
> Hi, > > [please do not look the other way when you respond to me, i.e. do not cull > me from the Cc: list. Thankyouverymuch] > > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Paul Gardiner wrote: > >> Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> >>> The thing is, filter-branch was _written for this purpose_. So if you >>> know what commit you rewrote last, you can make the process >>> faster/safer by issuing >>> >>> $ git filter-branch --msg-filter="<blabla>" <old-commit>..master >> That does look just what I need, but did you see the reason I thought I >> couldn't use it? I need to repeatedly sync the git repository from a >> live cvs repository, and repeatedly filter the new commit messages. > > Oh, I thought you saw why I put in that "<old-commit>...". You do not > really need it, as filter-branch will come up with the _same_ commit > hashes, unless _something_ was changed.
Thanks, that indeed works. Using filter-branch, using just --msg-filter does the job without altering hashes, and fromcvs/togit syncs up ignoring the alteration. My message filter is idempotent, so I can rerun it after every sync (or I might try your suggestion above to make it more efficient).
P.