Re: Project Hosting with git ?
- From
- Grégoire Barbier <devel@gbarbier.org>
- Date
- Jan 12, 2008, 18:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <47890078.3050809@gbarbier.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <9b3e2dc20801120954k24f7ccb6vf019f30843ff1b84@mail.gmail.com>
Stephen Sinclair a écrit :
Show 7 quoted lines
>> I disagree: git does not work "fine" over http, it only works fine for >> fetch/pull. > > You're taking me out of context. I meant it works fine for public > hosting so that users can easily clone and create patches. This is > the main motivation for publishing your repo, so in that sense it > "works fine". (for me)
I agree.
Show 7 quoted lines
> Since SF supports ssh, there's no reason to need http-push. I wish > they would just provide some recent git binaries on the sourceforge > server, then we could git-push properly over ssh instead of using to > use scp or rsync. I think that would be a good start. *shrug* > > In any case, http-push over webdav would still require git binaries to > be installed somewhere on SF, so it's essentially the same problem.
I don't think so. A working http-push over webdav would be a dumb protocol (passive filesystem upload). However as you said before, this would not be taken in account by SF statistics and menus.
-- Grégoire Barbier - gb à gbarbier.org - +33 6 21 35 73 49