From: Grégoire Barbier <devel@gbarbier.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:01:28 GMT
Subject: Re: Project Hosting with git ?
Message-ID: <47890078.3050809@gbarbier.org>
In-Reply-To: <9b3e2dc20801120954k24f7ccb6vf019f30843ff1b84@mail.gmail.com>

Stephen Sinclair a écrit :
>> I disagree: git does not work "fine" over http, it only works fine for
>> fetch/pull.
> 
> You're taking me out of context.  I meant it works fine for public
> hosting so that users can easily clone and create patches.  This is
> the main motivation for publishing your repo, so in that sense it
> "works fine".  (for me)

I agree.

> Since SF supports ssh, there's no reason to need http-push.  I wish
> they would just provide some recent git binaries on the sourceforge
> server, then we could git-push properly over ssh instead of using to
> use scp or rsync.  I think that would be a good start. *shrug*
> 
> In any case, http-push over webdav would still require git binaries to
> be installed somewhere on SF, so it's essentially the same problem.

I don't think so. A working http-push over webdav would be a dumb 
protocol (passive filesystem upload).
However as you said before, this would not be taken in account by SF 
statistics and menus.

-- 
Grégoire Barbier - gb à gbarbier.org - +33 6 21 35 73 49