git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Subversion developer: svn is for dumb people

From
Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
Date
Oct 18, 2007, 14:25 UTC
Message-ID
<47176CE0.7030609@midwinter.com>
Thought folks here might get a kick out of this:
http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79

Okay, my summary is slightly facetious, but that's basically the gist of what he's saying: you should choose Subversion rather than a DVCS because most of your users won't be smart enough to use the better tool.

I can't say he's completely wrong, especially about the 20/80% idea (though I think "20%" is generous), but some of his specific arguments about DVCS are on the bogus side. "Centralized systems encourage code reviews," for one -- I challenge him to find a project with a more pervasive and effective code-reviewing culture than the git project. I find code reviews *harder* in a centralized system because you end up building external tools to help people try out each other's changes.

-Steve
Next: David Brown
Message 1 of 8 in “Subversion developer: svn is for dumb people”
  1. Steven GrimmOct 18, 2007
  2. David BrownOct 18, 2007
  3. Jeff KingOct 18, 2007
  4. Sam VilainOct 18, 2007
  5. Pierre HabouzitOct 19, 2007
  6. Johannes SchindelinOct 19, 2007
  7. Pierre HabouzitOct 19, 2007
  8. Andy ParkinsOct 19, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.