Subversion developer: svn is for dumb people
- From
Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com>
- Date
- Oct 18, 2007, 14:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <47176CE0.7030609@midwinter.com>
Thought folks here might get a kick out of this:
http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79
Okay, my summary is slightly facetious, but that's basically the gist of what he's saying: you should choose Subversion rather than a DVCS because most of your users won't be smart enough to use the better tool.
I can't say he's completely wrong, especially about the 20/80% idea (though I think "20%" is generous), but some of his specific arguments about DVCS are on the bogus side. "Centralized systems encourage code reviews," for one -- I challenge him to find a project with a more pervasive and effective code-reviewing culture than the git project. I find code reviews *harder* in a centralized system because you end up building external tools to help people try out each other's changes.
-Steve