Re: [PATCH] Add test case for ls-files --with-head

From

Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>

Date

Oct 3, 2007, 12:09 UTC

Message-ID

<47038669.30302@viscovery.net>

In-Reply-To

<87y7ekr86e.wl%cworth@cworth.org>

Carl Worth schrieb:

> +for num in $(seq -f%04g 1 50); do
> +	touch sub/file-$num
> +	echo file-$num >> expected
> +done

seq is not universally available. Can we have that as

for i in 0 1 2 3 4; do
	for j in 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9; do
		> sub/file-$i$j
		echo file-$i$j >> expected
	done
done

-- Hannes