Re: "git diff --stat" doesn't show added empty file
- From
Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 13, 2009, 07:42 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46dff0320901122342q75e3e9e0gfe4e83bc7c60f193@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901120805310.6528@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
Show 28 quoted lines
> > > On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Ping Yin wrote: >> $ git diff --stat HEAD^.. >> 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > In the kernel, we use "git diff --stat --summary" for exactly this reason. > > Well, not exactly. > > The thing is, even if the file is _not_ empty, there's a huge difference > between "added 100 lines to an already-existing file" and "created a new > 100-line file". Which is exactly what "--summary" adds. > > And it sometimes even makes sense to show the summary without the > diffstat. If you're _only_ interested in create/delete/rename information, > you can do "git show --summary <cmit>". It won't give you line counts, but > it will give you information about any changes to filenames, eg in the > kernel archive, you could see an example of this with > > git show -M --summary 95b482a8d31116f3f5c2a5089569393234d06385 > > where you have a combination of renames, creates and deletes. > > So I think it's already better than what you ask for. > > Linus >
Thanks. --summary works. I just want to get all changed files. I think "git diff --name-status A..B" should be better.
Ping Yin