From: Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 07:42:22 GMT
Subject: Re: "git diff --stat" doesn't show added empty file
Message-ID: <46dff0320901122342q75e3e9e0gfe4e83bc7c60f193@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901120805310.6528@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Ping Yin wrote:
>> $ git diff --stat HEAD^..
>>  0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> In the kernel, we use "git diff --stat --summary" for exactly this reason.
>
> Well, not exactly.
>
> The thing is, even if the file is _not_ empty, there's a huge difference
> between "added 100 lines to an already-existing file" and "created a new
> 100-line file". Which is exactly what "--summary" adds.
>
> And it sometimes even makes sense to show the summary without the
> diffstat. If you're _only_ interested in create/delete/rename information,
> you can do "git show --summary <cmit>". It won't give you line counts, but
> it will give you information about any changes to filenames, eg in the
> kernel archive, you could see an example of this with
>
>        git show -M --summary 95b482a8d31116f3f5c2a5089569393234d06385
>
> where you have a combination of renames, creates and deletes.
>
> So I think it's already better than what you ask for.
>
>                        Linus
>

Thanks. --summary works.
I just want to get all changed files. I think "git diff --name-status
A..B" should be better.


Ping Yin