Re: [PATCH] bash: offer to show (un)staged changes
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 19, 2009, 18:00 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90901191000i250326e7k2184c149b70fcc8d@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20090119172939.GA14053@spearce.org>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> wrote:
> ... If we had > an inotify sort of daemon to keep the data current so the prompt > doesn't have to stat every source file on every display it would > be reasonable, but we don't have such a thing yet for Git.
Note that inotify is not recursive and is a hog if you ask it to monitor lots of dents.
I am not convinced that an inotify-enabled git is a good idea for anything but small/mid-sized project. And such don't need it either.
In other words, the kernel's cache will outperform any userland attempting to keep track of the fs via inotify.
cheers,
m
-- martin.langhoff@gmail.com martin@laptop.org -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff