Re: cg-mkpatch use case
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- May 2, 2006, 21:41 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90605021441t25152f7dtfed3828cd601b806@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <44570E8E.5070402@itaapy.com>
On 5/2/06, Belmar-Letelier <luis@itaapy.com> wrote:
> What is the Cogito way to apply the result of "cg-mkpatch"
AFAIK, cg-patch. However, cg-mkpatch appeared before cg-patch, so you may have a version of Cogito without cg-patch.
> 2. What are the difference between usecases with "cg-mkpatch" > and "git-format-patch" ?
If you are familiar with git tools, use them instead of cg tools ;-)
Cg is simpler, so if you have relatively simple needs, or a team with simple needs that doesn't need to know all the git tricks and internals, it can be a timesaver. In my team, people start with Cg and eventually evolve into using more and more of git.
cheers,
martin