From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 21:41:36 GMT
Subject: Re: cg-mkpatch use case
Message-ID: <46a038f90605021441t25152f7dtfed3828cd601b806@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <44570E8E.5070402@itaapy.com>

On 5/2/06, Belmar-Letelier <luis@itaapy.com> wrote:
>    What is the Cogito way to apply the result of "cg-mkpatch"

AFAIK, cg-patch. However, cg-mkpatch appeared before cg-patch, so you
may have a version of Cogito without cg-patch.

> 2. What are the difference between usecases with "cg-mkpatch"
>    and "git-format-patch" ?

If you are familiar with git tools, use them instead of cg tools ;-)

Cg is simpler, so if you have relatively simple needs, or a team with
simple needs that doesn't need to know all the git tricks and
internals, it can be a timesaver. In my team, people start with Cg and
eventually evolve into using more and more of git.

cheers,


martin