Re: [PATCH] archimport improvements
- From
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
- Date
- Nov 24, 2005, 09:25 UTC
- Message-ID
- <46a038f90511240125s1617cd44n868d77204ea87f78@mail.gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20051124074605.GA4789@mail.yhbt.net>
On 11/24/05, Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Ok, I didn't expect you guys to have 12k of files in your trees. None > of your source trees are remotely close to that size (but I have many > more changesets). I'm surprised you guys were able to put up > with Arch in the first place! > > 125m58.431s with my method. > 8m24.504s with yours :) > > All of my usual source trees imported 1k changesets in 10-15 minutes
:-) I'm happy that you managed to wait patiently for it to complete -- all my attempts to run your import code were ended by a sleepy ctrl-c.
> Patches on the way.
Cool -- will review, but may take a couple days, as I'm away from home this week.
> OTOH, the time spent importing the bulk of the history is a one-time > operation for most people and I'd much rather it get things as right as > possible and move on.
Hmmm. Some teams -- such as mine -- just run it every couple hours to maintain an Arch2cvs gateway.
More later,
martin