Re: [OT?] git tools at SourceForge ?

From: Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>
Date: Aug 12, 2005, 23:17 UTC
Message-ID: <46a038f90508121617560d00c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0508121513530.3295@g5.osdl.org>

>  - the git architecture is admirably suited to an _untrusted_ central
>    server, ie exactly the SourceForge kind of setup. I realize that the

Definitely. And beyond that too. Using SF for CVS means that when SF's CVS service is down (often enough) you can't commit (or even fscking diff) until they are back up. Every single damn operation does a roundtrip. This also means a huge load on their servers.

I'm sure SF will be glad to see CVS fall our of favour.

>    Yes, developers can just merge with each other directly

I take it that you mean an exchange of patches that does not depend on having public repos. What are the mechanisms available on that front, other than patchbombs?

>    This is _exactly_ where something like SF really ends up being helpful.
>    It's a _hosting_ service, and git is eminently suitable to being

Not sure whether SF is offering rsync, but they do support hosting of arbitrarty data -- and a project using GIT can use that to host several developer trees . It'd be nice if SF offered gitweb and similar niceties. As my usage of GIT increases, I may add support for it on Eduforge.org

If I had more (hw/time) resources I'd do the git proxying of CVS projects, but that's huge.

> And so I'd be thrilled to have some site like SF support it.

Eduforge's charter is to host education-related projects, so that's not a free-for-all-comers, but I'm considering git support, as our usage of git is growing.

cheers,

martin