Re: git-fsck/lost-found's speed vs git-prune's

From: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
Date: Sep 18, 2007, 09:14 UTC
Message-ID: <46EF96FD.1050602@vilain.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070918090926.GA8927@glandium.org>

Mike Hommey wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if that was to be expected for git-fsck to be
> significantly slower than git-prune (by several orders of magnitude) ?
>
> $ time git-lost-found
>
> real    8m22.167s
> user    6m44.153s
> sys     1m16.613s
>
> $ time git-prune
>
> real    0m0.376s
> user    0m0.304s
> sys     0m0.000s
>

You're probably already packed. I'd expect a similar speed difference between git-fsck and git-fsck --full.

Sam.