git-fsck/lost-found's speed vs git-prune's

From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Date: Sep 18, 2007, 09:09 UTC
Message-ID: <20070918090926.GA8927@glandium.org>

Hi,

I was wondering if that was to be expected for git-fsck to be significantly slower than git-prune (by several orders of magnitude) ?

$ time git-lost-found

real 8m22.167s user 6m44.153s sys 1m16.613s

$ time git-prune

real 0m0.376s user 0m0.304s sys 0m0.000s

Mike

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.