git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?

From
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@eudaptics.com>
Date
Jul 13, 2007, 10:33 UTC
Message-ID
<469754DE.4A4EE499@eudaptics.com>
In-Reply-To
<18071.19489.6733.665052@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Try this, let me know what you think.  I called the changes in the
> working directory "Local uncommitted changes, not checked in to index"
> and the changes in the index "Local changes checked in to index but
> not committed".  If you prefer some other wording, let me know.
Maybe you go with git-gui's wording:
Index: Staged changes
WD:    Unstaged changes

-- Hannes
Previous: Linus TorvaldsNext: Linus Torvalds
Message 8 of 9 in “Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?”
  1. Linus TorvaldsJul 12, 2007
  2. Junio C HamanoJul 12, 2007
  3. Junio C HamanoJul 12, 2007
  4. Linus TorvaldsJul 12, 2007
  5. Paul MackerrasJul 13, 2007
  6. Paul MackerrasJul 13, 2007
  7. Linus TorvaldsJul 13, 2007
  8. Johannes SixtJul 13, 2007
  9. Linus TorvaldsJul 13, 2007

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.