From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@eudaptics.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:33:02 GMT
Subject: Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'?
Message-ID: <469754DE.4A4EE499@eudaptics.com>
In-Reply-To: <18071.19489.6733.665052@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Try this, let me know what you think.  I called the changes in the
> working directory "Local uncommitted changes, not checked in to index"
> and the changes in the index "Local changes checked in to index but
> not committed".  If you prefer some other wording, let me know.

Maybe you go with git-gui's wording:

Index: Staged changes
WD:    Unstaged changes

-- Hannes