Re: [PATCH] git-blame --incremental: don't use pager
- From
René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
- Date
- Jan 29, 2007, 00:32 UTC
- Message-ID
- <45BD40AE.9020603@lsrfire.ath.cx>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vzm83dkw4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano schrieb:
Show 6 quoted lines
> Although I'd apply it anyway, strictly speaking, I think this > patch should not matter because any real Porcelain would be > using this as an upstream of a pipe to its drawing engine. > > Well, unless that Porcelain drives --incremental through a pair > of ptys, but I do not think it is likely ;-).
Ha!, didn't think of that. I still like it more without a pager even if run on a terminal, because then you can *see* that it's really incremental (without needing to unset PAGER). I'm a non-believer. ;-)
René